(pls help)
Guadalupé’s Argument:
Christchurch’s air temperature is cooler than usual during El Niño years because the prevailing winds are disrupted and the currents change. Therefore, the change in air temperature is caused by changing winds and currents.
Anthony’s Argument:
Christchurch’s air temperature is cooler than usual during El Niño years because the prevailing winds are disrupted. This evidence matters because prevailing winds push the warm currents that pass Christchurch. These currents carry energy, and that energy is transferred to the air, which makes the air warmer. When prevailing winds are disrupted, they do not push the currents toward Christchurch, so the energy transfer does not happen. This makes the air temperature cooler. Therefore, the change in air temperature is caused by changing winds and changing currents.
Who\'s argument is more convincing?
Guadalupé’s or Anthony\'s
Guadalupé’s Argument:
Christchurch’s air temperature is cooler than usual during El Niño years because the prevailing winds are disrupted and the currents change. Therefore, the change in air temperature is caused by changing winds and currents.
Anthony’s Argument:
Christchurch’s air temperature is cooler than usual during El Niño years because the prevailing winds are disrupted. This evidence matters because prevailing winds push the warm currents that pass Christchurch. These currents carry energy, and that energy is transferred to the air, which makes the air warmer. When prevailing winds are disrupted, they do not push the currents toward Christchurch, so the energy transfer does not happen. This makes the air temperature cooler. Therefore, the change in air temperature is caused by changing winds and changing currents.
Who\'s argument is more convincing?
Guadalupé’s or Anthony\'s
Answer
5
(1 star)
0
wensday11
1 year ago
2 response - 0 helps
Anthony’s because it explains way more